Jay Schweikert is a policy analyst with the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice. His research and advocacy focuses on accountability for prosecutors and law enforcement, plea bargaining, Sixth Amendment trial rights, and the provision and structuring of indigent defense. Before joining Cato, Jay spent four years doing civil and criminal litigation at Williams & Connolly LLP. He holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he was an Articles Editor for the Harvard Law Review, and chaired the Harvard Federalist Society’s student colloquium program. Following law school, Jay clerked for Judge Diane Sykes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He holds a B.A. in political science and economics from Yale University.
McCoy v. Louisiana - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast featuring Jay Schweikert
On May 14, 2018, the Supreme Court decided McCoy v. Louisiana, a case considering whether...
Qualified Immunity Lurks in the Background of the Fourth Amendment Question in Collins v. Virginia
On May 30th, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Collins v. Virginia, which held...