Listen & Download
We live in a system where regulators make rules, investigate alleged violations of the rules, and then adjudicate those violations before an Administrative Law Judge who is a member of the agency. When agency decisions are appealed to the traditional court system, judges are obligated to “defer” to the agency on both its legal and factual conclusions. Many opponents of this scheme have criticized the system for “placing a thumb on the scales of justice” by encouraging judicial bias. Many of the same critics assert that the current system of administrative law offends the rule of law, due process, and separation of powers. In April 2018, Arizona passed first-of-its-kind legislation, developed by the Goldwater Institute, that eliminates this legal deference in state courts. This Teleforum call will explore this new law, discuss how it might change state agency rulemaking and enforcement, and also examine how the law might address concerns regarding judicial bias and other issues. Importantly, this program will also consider whether this legislation can serve as a model for the rest of the country, and the federal government.
Visit our website – RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.
- Philip Hamburger, Maurice and Hilda Friedman Professor of Law, Columbia Law School
- Jonathan Riches, Director of National Litigation, Goldwater Institute
- [Moderator] Devon Westhill, Director, Regulatory Transparency Project
To listen to this Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum, please dial 888-752-3232 at 12:00 p.m.